summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/testsuite.py
diff options
context:
space:
mode:
Diffstat (limited to 'testsuite.py')
-rw-r--r--testsuite.py157
1 files changed, 23 insertions, 134 deletions
diff --git a/testsuite.py b/testsuite.py
index 586899a..f6f9c98 100644
--- a/testsuite.py
+++ b/testsuite.py
@@ -145,13 +145,6 @@ def get_choices(config):
unique_choices.append(choice)
return unique_choices
-def get_parent(item):
- if isinstance(item, (Symbol, Choice)):
- if not item.nodes:
- return None
- return item.nodes[0].parent.item
- return item.node.parent.item
-
def get_prompts(item):
prompts = []
for node in item.nodes:
@@ -896,153 +889,49 @@ g
verify_visibility(c.named_choices["TRISTATE_CHOICE_IF_M_AND_Y"], 0, 1)
verify_visibility(c.named_choices["TRISTATE_CHOICE_MENU_N_AND_Y"], 0, 0)
- # Menu visibility
-
- def verify_menu_visibility(menu, no_module_vis, module_vis):
- c.modules.set_value(0)
- menu_vis = expr_value(menu.node.dep)
- verify(menu_vis == no_module_vis,
- "menu \"{}\" should have visibility '{}' without modules, "
- "has visibility '{}'"
- .format(menu.title, no_module_vis, menu_vis))
-
- c.modules.set_value(2)
- menu_vis = expr_value(menu.node.dep)
- verify(menu_vis == module_vis,
- "menu \"{}\" should have visibility '{}' with modules, "
- "has visibility '{}'".
- format(menu.title, module_vis, menu_vis))
-
- # TODO: does this make sense anymore?
-
- #menu_n, menu_m, menu_y, menu_if_n, menu_if_m, menu_if_y, \
- # menu_if_m_and_y = get_menus(c)[5:-5]
-
- #verify_menu_visibility(menu_n, "n", "n")
- #verify_menu_visibility(menu_m, "n", "m")
- #verify_menu_visibility(menu_y, "y", "y")
- #verify_menu_visibility(menu_if_n, "n", "n")
- #verify_menu_visibility(menu_if_m, "n", "m")
- #verify_menu_visibility(menu_if_y, "y", "y")
- #verify_menu_visibility(menu_if_m_and_y, "n", "m")
-
- # Menu 'visible if' visibility
-
- menu_visible_if_n, menu_visible_if_m, menu_visible_if_y, \
- menu_visible_if_m_2 = get_menus(c)[13:]
-
- def verify_visible_if_visibility(menu, no_module_vis, module_vis):
- c.modules.set_value(0)
- menu_vis = menu.get_visible_if_visibility()
- verify(menu_vis == no_module_vis,
- "menu \"{}\" should have 'visible if' visibility '{}' "
- "without modules, has 'visible if' visibility '{}'".
- format(menu.title, no_module_vis, menu_vis))
-
- c.modules.set_value(2)
- menu_vis = menu.get_visible_if_visibility()
- verify(menu_vis == module_vis,
- "menu \"{}\" should have 'visible if' visibility '{}' "
- "with modules, has 'visible if' visibility '{}'".
- format(menu.title, module_vis, menu_vis))
-
- # TODO: verify the visible if stuff after unclassing
-
- # Ordinary visibility should not affect 'visible if' visibility
- #verify_visible_if_visibility(menu_n, "y", "y")
- #verify_visible_if_visibility(menu_if_n, "y", "y")
- #verify_visible_if_visibility(menu_m, "y", "y")
- #verify_visible_if_visibility(menu_if_m, "y", "y")
-
- #verify_visible_if_visibility(menu_visible_if_n, "n", "n")
- #verify_visible_if_visibility(menu_visible_if_m, "n", "m")
- #verify_visible_if_visibility(menu_visible_if_y, "y", "y")
- #verify_visible_if_visibility(menu_visible_if_m_2, "n", "m")
-
# Verify that 'visible if' visibility gets propagated to prompts
+
verify_visibility(c.syms["VISIBLE_IF_N"], 0, 0)
verify_visibility(c.syms["VISIBLE_IF_M"], 0, 1)
verify_visibility(c.syms["VISIBLE_IF_Y"], 2, 2)
verify_visibility(c.syms["VISIBLE_IF_M_2"], 0, 1)
- # Comment visibility
-
- def verify_comment_visibility(comment, no_module_vis, module_vis):
- c.modules.set_value(0)
- # TODO: uninternalize
- comment_vis = expr_value(comment.node.dep)
- verify(comment_vis == no_module_vis,
- "comment \"{}\" should have visibility '{}' without "
- "modules, has visibility '{}'".
- format(comment.text, no_module_vis, comment_vis))
-
- c.modules.set_value(2)
- comment_vis = expr_value(comment.node.dep)
- verify(comment_vis == module_vis,
- "comment \"{}\" should have visibility '{}' with "
- "modules, has visibility '{}'".
- format(comment.text, module_vis, comment_vis))
-
- # TODO: verify the visibility stuff for comments
-
- #comment_n, comment_m, comment_y, comment_if_n, comment_if_m, \
- # comment_if_y, comment_m_nested = get_comments(c)
-
- #verify_comment_visibility(comment_n, "n", "n")
- #verify_comment_visibility(comment_m, "n", "m")
- #verify_comment_visibility(comment_y, "y", "y")
- #verify_comment_visibility(comment_if_n, "n", "n")
- #verify_comment_visibility(comment_if_m, "n", "m")
- #verify_comment_visibility(comment_if_y, "y", "y")
- #verify_comment_visibility(comment_m_nested, "n", "m")
-
# Verify that string/int/hex symbols with m visibility accept a user value
assign_and_verify("STRING_m", "foo bar")
assign_and_verify("INT_m", "123")
assign_and_verify("HEX_m", "0x123")
- #
- # Object relations
- #
+
+ print("Testing object relations...")
c = Kconfig("Kconfiglib/tests/Krelation")
- UNDEFINED, A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I = \
- c.syms["UNDEFINED"], c.syms["A"], c.syms["B"], c.syms["C"], \
- c.syms["D"], c.syms["E"], c.syms["F"], c.syms["G"], c.syms["H"], \
- c.syms["I"]
+ A, B, C, D, E, F, G, H, I = \
+ c.syms["A"], c.syms["B"], c.syms["C"], c.syms["D"], c.syms["E"], \
+ c.syms["F"], c.syms["G"], c.syms["H"], c.syms["I"]
choice_1, choice_2 = get_choices(c)
- # TODO: test new prompts
- #verify([menu.title for menu in get_menus(c)[1:]] ==
- # ["m1", "m2", "m3", "m4"],
- # "menu ordering is broken")
- #menu_1, menu_2, menu_3, menu_4 = get_menus(c)[1:]
+ verify(A.nodes[0].parent is c.top_node,
+ "A's parent should be the top node")
- print("Testing object relations...")
+ verify(B.nodes[0].parent.item is choice_1,
+ "B's parent should be the first choice")
+
+ verify(C.nodes[0].parent.item is B,
+ "C's parent should be B (due to auto menus)")
+
+ verify(E.nodes[0].parent.item == MENU,
+ "E's parent should be a menu")
+
+ verify(E.nodes[0].parent.parent is c.top_node,
+ "E's grandparent should be the top node")
- # TODO: check parents for menus
-
- verify(get_parent(UNDEFINED) is None,
- "Undefined symbols should have no parent")
- # TODO: update this test (should be the main menu)
- # TODO: test parents when automatic menus are involved
- #verify(A.get_parent() is None, "A should not have a parent")
- verify(get_parent(B) is choice_1, "B's parent should be the first choice")
- # TODO: no longer true due to auto menus
- #verify(get_parent(C) is choice_1, "C's parent should be the first choice")
- #verify(get_parent(E) is menu_1, "E's parent should be the first menu")
- # TODO: update this test
- #verify(E.get_parent().get_parent() is None,
- # "E's grandparent should be None")
- verify(get_parent(G) is choice_2,
+ verify(G.nodes[0].parent.item is choice_2,
"G's parent should be the second choice")
- #verify(get_parent(get_parent(G)) is menu_2,
- # "G's grandparent should be the second menu")
- # TODO: test parents of comments
- # TODO: test top node
+ verify(G.nodes[0].parent.parent.item == MENU,
+ "G's grandparent should be a menu")
#
# hex/int ranges
@@ -1668,7 +1557,7 @@ g
sym = c.syms[name]
verify(sym.choice is not None and
sym in choice_weird_syms.syms and
- get_parent(sym) is choice_weird_syms,
+ sym.nodes[0].parent.item is choice_weird_syms,
"{} should be a normal choice symbol".format(sym.name))
# TODO: parent stuff
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.46.0) at 2026-05-15 16:29:26 +0000