diff options
| author | Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com> | 2015-05-25 10:05:02 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com> | 2015-05-25 10:05:02 +0200 |
| commit | add5d35159189c95761a87ba4102861f5b9a265e (patch) | |
| tree | a150cc49fe1a3c3fad591deaf1c62c90981adabf | |
| parent | 71b71a1ee51d0dc249250f7cfed0123ed1430f3f (diff) | |
Clean up readme a bit.
| -rw-r--r-- | README.md | 8 |
1 files changed, 4 insertions, 4 deletions
@@ -15,11 +15,11 @@ with `comment`s inside `choice`s (that didn't affect correctness but made output differ) the test suite now passes with Linux v4.0-rc3. Very little seems to have changed in the C implementation over the past years, which makes me happy. :) -Despite the warnings, modules *are* supported by the way (otherwise tests would break -horribly). The warnings are related to `option modules`, which lets you select which -symbol serves as the `MODULES` symbol. (It's always `MODULES` in the kernel, and +Despite the warnings, modules *are* supported by the way (or tests would break +horribly). The warnings are related to `option modules`, which specifies what +symbol serves as the `MODULES` symbol. It's always `MODULES` in the kernel, and older versions of the `Kconfig` files did not set `option modules` on it -- hence the -warnings. With newer versions of the C implementation it's required.) I should add +warnings. With newer versions of the C implementation it's required. I should add support for `option modules` in a backwards-compatible way. ## Installation ## |