diff options
| author | Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com> | 2015-05-25 18:23:24 +0200 |
|---|---|---|
| committer | Ulf Magnusson <ulfalizer@gmail.com> | 2015-05-25 18:23:24 +0200 |
| commit | abca072f0558825fc45e14e09ef9dcd8bfee8276 (patch) | |
| tree | c2ff06db08818f84b7b789ded9f748add17682db | |
| parent | 53b272d567275be64fa1547294397f8b64b46635 (diff) | |
More readme nits.
| -rw-r--r-- | README.md | 4 |
1 files changed, 2 insertions, 2 deletions
@@ -15,9 +15,9 @@ with `comment`s inside `choice`s (that didn't affect correctness but made output differ) the test suite now passes with Linux v4.0-rc3. Very little seems to have changed in the C implementation over the past years, which is nice. :) -Despite the warnings, modules *are* supported by the way (or tests would break +Despite the warnings, modules *are* supported (or tests would break horribly). The warnings are related to `option modules`, which specifies what -symbol serves as the `MODULES` symbol. It's always `MODULES` in the kernel, and +symbol serves as the `MODULES` symbol. It's always "MODULES" in the kernel, and older versions of the `Kconfig` files did not set `option modules` on it -- hence the warnings. With newer versions of the C implementation it's required. I should add support for `option modules` in a backwards-compatible way. |