From 1e234ca06ef1df9f66a428d51e893a676ac77d7a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: ulfalizer Date: Fri, 13 Mar 2015 14:58:02 +0100 Subject: Clarify 'option modules' note a bit --- README.md | 9 +++++---- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) (limited to 'README.md') diff --git a/README.md b/README.md index 7066ba9..89cabf7 100644 --- a/README.md +++ b/README.md @@ -12,14 +12,15 @@ Thanks to a patch from Philip Craig (https://github.com/philipc) that adds suppo for the new `allnoconfig_y` option (which sets the user value of certain symbols to `y` during `make allnoconfig` to improve coverage) and fixes an obscure issue with `comment`s inside `choice`s (that didn't affect correctness but made outputs -differ), the testsuite now passes with Linux v4.0-rc3. Very little seems to have +differ) the testsuite now passes with Linux v4.0-rc3. Very little seems to have changed in the C implementation over the past years, which makes me happy. :) Despite the warnings, modules *are* supported by the way (otherwise tests would break horribly). The warnings are related to `option modules`, which lets you select which -symbol serves as the `MODULES` symbol. (In the kernel, it's always `MODULES`, and old -version didn't require setting `option modules` on it -- hence the warnings.) I should -add support for `option modules` in a backwards-compatible way. +symbol serves as the `MODULES` symbol. (It's always `MODULES` in the kernel, and +older versions of the `Kconfig` files not set `option modules` on it -- hence the +warnings. With newer versions of the C implementation it's required.) I should add +support for `option modules` in a backwards-compatible way. ## Installation ## -- cgit v1.2.3